Saturday, July 26, 2014

Three Reasons Tony LaRussa Doesn't Belong In Baseball Hall of Fame

 Baseball Tony LaRussa - Baseball Hall of Fame- Hall of Fame Voting -

Three Reasons Tony LaRussa Doesn't Belong In Baseball  Hall of Fame

Heard of Bryant Gumbel's comments questioning the inconsistency that allowed Tony LaRussa's recent induction into the Hall of Fame(as manager)  but not his long-time player, Mark McGwire. and we  were thinking along those lines, ourselves.  And, it was one thing at Oakland when Jose Conseco , Mark McGwire and steroids were a pretty new thing in baseball in 1988, but by the time LaRussa got to  St. Louis it was pretty well known that McGwire was using Creatine if not other performance enhancing drugs as McGwire joined the team in the mid-90s. It wasn't until McGwire finally admitted he was using that LaRussa made a few light weight comments, hardly condemning McGwire. In fact, LaRussa would invite McGwire back to St. Louis as a hitting coach after his playing days were over. La Russa had at least one other player at St. Louis, too, who had all the indications of a player on steroids. Without those three guys, one could probably subtract at least a few dozen wins and probably a World Series victory or two of three La Russa garnered during his tenure as manager of Oakland and St Louis. Even so, LaRussa had a modest .536 winning percentage which ranks him #62 (See Above Chart)  among all managers win-loss records - and he had good- to- very good teams to manager. Even Don Mattingly, Bob Brenly,  Ken Macha and Herman Franks had better managerial records than LaRussa. Baseball Tony LaRussa - Baseball Tony LaRussa , Baseball Hall of Fame, Hall of Fame Voting, The History of Baseball, Cooperstown Hall of Fame,Baseball Hall of Fame,Hall of Fame Voting

No doubt, Tony La Russa, who has a law degree among other things, would seem to be a fine person albeit a bit of a temper, and has done a lot for the community in and outside of baseball;he started what has become a large-scale  pet animal rescue foundation (ARF).
Yet, for whatever reason, La Russa -who admits it himself - never achieved the greatness many have lauded after him, perhaps mistaking his longevity and  piloting good teams with success.
La Russa will  tell you he takes responsibility for not winning the 1988 and 1990 World Series as skipper of the A's .  For a man of letters, his managerial style was not always empiracle and often more a matter of emotion than science.  While he could be a 'players manager'  he could also attract enemies easily and , perhaps,   thereby  not always getting the most out of players.
Then , there is that other issue of early PEDs in baseball  and his looking the other away, allowing his team to take an unfair advantage.  WE LIKE THE FACT THAT LARUSSA  WAS ACCEPTING OF HIS PLAYERS' SERIOUS ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT, BUT HE COULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING SOONER AND NIPPED THE PROBLEM IN THE BUD (such as by taking the players aside , privately, and warn of them of likely consequences ) but he didn't and it when on for decades - and he wasn't the only such manager as we'll note below with Bruce Bochy.

Now, LaRussa has come out in favor of letting PED players in the Hall of Fame.  It was one thing to ignore his own players using, but to sanction Hall of Fame inclusion is going way to far in our opinion. It's TOTALLY UNFAIR to those not using, as    players like  Johnny Gomes, Jake Peavey and others will tell you. Take a guy like Barry Bonds - a .275 hitter who had never hit more than 34 homeruns in seven years with the Pirates; once joining the Giants and the drug culture -at an advanced age- his batting average shot up to .325 and 45 homers per year (average) with high water marks of 73 homers and .360 average. Without the obvious PEDs Bonds - who every forgets was NOT a superstar before joining the Giants-  would be be Hall of Fame fare, and Bonds was probably at the top of all the PED players. So, how can ANY of them really deserve to be in the Hall. McGwire was a strike out king before steroids and Conseco not much better - but they were early in the game using somewhat less powerful drugs, in our opinion - another issue one would have to take in to consideration if deciding among PED players.  Best way is to leave them ALL out.  If McGwire and Conseco - or anyone else-  were stars BEFORE PEDs it would be one thing. But it doesn't work that way. Name us a single example of a player who was deserving BEFORE he took PEDs.  If Bonds wasn't, we can't imagine who would be.... Then, La Russa , as a manager, with or without PED players, did not have that fantastic of a record as we see in the below chart...

 The only modern day manager to make the Hall with a worse record than LaRussa was Whitey Herzog (.532) Surely, as a player McGwire may not deserve to go into the Hall of his numbers, nor even Barry Bonds, a mere .275 hitter averaging around 25 homers a year before coming to San Francisco and  it's PED culture.   For longevity, La Russa should get something being the third most tenured manager of all time, 33 years.


The same could be said of a manager like San Francisco Giants manager,Bruce Bochy, who many (especially in San Francisco) expect to  be a likely candidate for the Hall of Fame as manager .  He not only turned a blind eye to a host of PED players such as Ken Camaniti when he was manager at San Diego but when he came to  San Francisco it was even worse, where he he sanctioned Barry Bonds and  friends in the Capital of Sports Steroids. Even with a succession of indicted steroid users in San Diego and San Francisco, Bochy barely has a .500 record(.502)  as manager in both cities (.479 in San Diego and .505 in San Francisco and ranks way down in 144th place behind Bobby Valentine and just ahead of Kirk Gibson .   At least Dusty Baker had the good sense to part ways with Bonds and  San Francisco in 1996 before Bochy came in.  Perhaps someone like Baker would deserve a Hall of Fame spot  for standing his ground while also having a decent record as manager . That Tony La Russa is only the 62 most winning manager and Bruce Bochy #133 of all time, we don't believe that either should get into the managerial Hall of Fame based on their records , alone;add the fact that they were likely knowing and accepting of tainted players who helped their cause makes our decision a 'slam dunk'that  these two should not enter the Hall of Fame at all.


----- -

    Watching the Philadelphia Phillies play the Giants was a pretty pathetic experience the past few days.  Not that the Giants are so hot - but they at least can summon up that extra something once in awhile -even if it takes 14 innings. The Phillies make the Giants pitchers look like Cy Young winners, not even making contact time and again with runners in scoring position. It seems as though the Phillies, now in last place in the NL East, have given up. Despite a few big names like Utley, Rollins and Howard (though the latter was one of those strike out kings in tough situations), Philadelphia can really use some help. With the exception of pitcher AJ Burnett and leadoff man Rivera there wasn't a lot of good to say about the Phils.  Even the team announcers seemed to be in a coma, perhaps put there by an inept team that had only scored a couple of runs through the first three games of the series.  While the Giants announcers can sometimes be a bit hyper and in-your-face, the Phillies guys can put you right to sleep along with their team.  Doubt the Giants will be quite so fortunate to have opponents like they've had the past week in Miami and Philly in coming weeks, though, as we know, Sabean and the Giants have a way of getting things done come season's end, even if they have to - and probably will-  sink the bottom of the barrel to do it.

Could you believe the reports that the Giants are interested in the Mets' Bartolo Colon?  So much for Giants President Larry Baer's statements that they'll try to steer away from PED players.  You'd' think they could do better than Dan Uggla and the tainted 42-year-old Colon - not to mention possible embarassment, though most Giants fans dont' seem to care.

Baseball Tony LaRussa - Baseball Hall of Fame- Hall of Fame Voting,
 The History of Baseball, Cooperstown Hall of Fame

Friday, June 27, 2014

BLOOD FEUD by Ed Klein - How Hillary, Obama Really Feel About Each Other, Secret Deal, Bad Heart

BLOOD FEUD by Ed Klein  - How Hillary, Obama Really Feel About Each Other, Secret Deal, Bad Heart
***** 5 stars

Click here to subscribe to  updates

Hillary Clinton is said to have told close  friends that Obama 'is never there,' hardly works and that she has no respect for him, according to the new book, 'Blood Feud,' by noted author  Ed Klein.

Furthermore, we learn that the Clintons made a deal with Obama that Bill would stump for Obama to help him win the 2012 election if Obama would help Hillary get elected in 2016. Hillary is furiousthat Obama has not kept his end of the deal.

Hillary's medical issue is a lot more serious than her press secretary reported in December.  BLOOD FEUD by Ed Klein  - How Hillary, Obama Really Feel About Each Other, Secret Deal, Bad Heart, Interesting Facts About President Obama, President Obama biography, Hillary Clinton Biography - See more below

In his new book, “Blood Feud,” journalist Edward Klein gets inside the dysfunctional, jealous relationship between Bill and Hillary Clinton and Barack and Michelle Obama — and how it could explode in 2016.
Outwardly, they put on a show of unity — but privately, the Obamas and Clintons, the two power couples of the Democratic Party, loathe each other.
“I hate that man Obama more than any man I’ve ever met, more than any man who ever lived,” Bill Clinton said to friends on one occasion, adding he would never forgive Obama for suggesting he was a racist during the 2008 campaign.
The feeling is mutual. Obama made ­excuses not to talk to Bill, while the first lady privately sniped about Hillary.
On most evenings, Michelle Obama and her trusted adviser, Valerie Jarrett, met in a quiet corner of the White House residence. They’d usually open a bottle of Chardonnay, catch up on news about Sasha and Malia, and gossip about people who gave them heartburn.
Their favorite bĂȘte noire was Hillary Clinton, whom they nicknamed “Hildebeest,” after the menacing and shaggy-maned gnu that roams the Serengeti.

‘Michelle could be president’

The animosity came to a head in the run-up to the 2012 election, when Obama’s inner circle insisted he needed the former president’s support to win. Obama finally telephoned Bill Clinton in September 2011 and invited him out for a round of golf.
“I’m not going to enjoy this,” Bill told Hillary when they gathered with a group of friends and political associates at Whitehaven, their neo-Georgian home on Embassy Row in Washington, DC.
“I’ve had two successors since I left the White House — Bush and Obama — and I’ve heard more from Bush, asking for my advice, than I’ve heard from Obama. I have no relationship with the president — none whatsoever,” Clinton said.
“I really can’t stand the way Obama ­always seems to be hectoring when he talks to me,” Clinton added, according to someone who was present at the gathering and spoke on the condition of anonymity. “Sometimes we just stare at each other. It’s pretty damn awkward. Now we both have favors to ask each other, and it’s going to be very unpleasant. But I’ve got to get this guy to owe me and to be on our side.”
During the golf game, Clinton didn’t waste any time reminding Obama that as president, he had presided over eight years of prosperity, while Obama had been unable to dig the country out of the longest financial ­doldrums since the Great Depression.
“Bill got into it right away,” said a Clinton family friend. “He told Obama, ‘Hillary and I are gearing up for a run in 2016.’ He said Hillary would be ‘the most qualified, most experienced candidate, perhaps in history.’ His reference to Hillary’s experience made Obama wince, since it was clearly a shot at his lack of experience when he ran for president.
“And so Bill continued to talk about Hillary’s qualifications . . . and the coming campaign in 2016. But Barack didn’t bite. He changed the subject several times. Then suddenly, Barack said something that took Bill by complete surprise. He said, ‘You know, Michelle would make a great presidential candidate, too.’
“Bill was speechless. Was Barack comparing Michelle’s qualifications to Hillary’s? Bill said that if he hadn’t been on a mission to strike a deal with Barack, he might have stormed off the golf course then and there.”

BlackBerry snub

Bill Clinton would go on to campaign for Obama in 2012, but he felt betrayed when the president seemed to waver when it came to a 2016 endorsement of Hillary. Obama attempted to smooth things over with a joint “60 Minutes” interview with Hillary, and later a private dinner for the two couples at the White House.
 - Bill Clinton In 'Blood Feud'
And so, on March 1, 2013 — the very day that the $85 billion in budget cuts known as the “sequester” went into effect — the Clintons slipped unnoticed into the White House and sat down for dinner with the Obamas in the Residence.
Typically, once Obama decided to do something (for example, the surge in Afghanistan), he immediately had second thoughts, and his behavior during dinner degenerated from moody to grumpy to bad-tempered.
After the obligatory greetings and small talk about family, Obama asked Bill what he thought about the sequester: Would it turn out to be a political plus for him? Bill went into a long — and boring — lecture about the issue.
To change the subject, Hillary asked Michelle if it was true, as she had heard, that the first lady was thinking about running for the Senate from Illinois.
Michelle said that she was warming to the idea, though she had yet to make up her mind.
Bill shot Hillary a look of incredulity.
Bill then moved the conversation to Obama’s vaunted 2012 campaign ­organization. He told Obama that it would be a good idea to fold the organization, along with all its digital and social-media bells and whistles, into the Democratic National Committee.
Obama’s only response was a disparaging smile.
Modal Trigger
President Barack Obama acts cordial with former President Bill Clinton, but it’s all for show, according to the new book “Blood Feud” by journalist Edward Klein.Photo: White House
“You have to use your organization to aid the candidate in 2016,” Bill pressed Obama.
“Really?” Obama replied in a tone of undisguised sarcasm.
The two men went back and forth over the subject of where the money for Obama’s campaign organization had come from and how to allocate funds for the 2016 presidential election. Bill raised his voice. So did Obama.
As Bill Clinton went on about his managerial experience, Obama began playing with his BlackBerry under the table, making it plain that he wasn’t paying attention to anything Clinton had to say. He was intentionally snubbing Clinton. Others around the table noticed Obama thumbing his BlackBerry, and the atmosphere turned even colder than before.
Hillary changed the subject again.
“Are you glad you won’t have to campaign again?” she asked Obama. “You don’t seem to ­enjoy it.”
“For a guy who doesn’t like it,” Obama replied tartly, “I’ve done pretty well.”
“Well,” Bill said, adding his two cents, “I was glad to pitch in and help get you re-elected.”
There was another long pause. Finally, Obama turned to Bill and said, sotto voce, “Thanks.”
After the dinner, and once the Clintons had been ushered out of the family quarters, Obama shook his head and said, “That’s why I never invite that guy over.”

Obama’s Mini-Me

Lately, Bill Clinton has become convinced that Obama won’t endorse Hillary in 2016. During a gathering at Whitehaven, guests overheard Bill talking to his daughter, Chelsea, about whether the president would back Joe Biden.
“Recently, I’ve been hearing a different scenario from state committeemen,” Clinton said. “They say he’s looking for a candidate who’s just like him. Someone relatively unknown. Someone with a fresh face.
“He’s convinced himself he’s been a brilliant president, and wants to clone himself — to find his Mini-Me.
“He’s hunting for someone to succeed him, and he believes the American people don’t want to vote for someone who’s been around for a long time. He thinks that your mother and I are what he calls ‘so 20th century.’ He’s looking for ­another Barack Obama.”
Excerpted from “Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Obamas” by Edward Klein, out this week from Regnery Publishing as reported in NEW YORK POST, JUNE 21, 2014

**Exclusive** from the Drudge Report 6-27-14:

"A new provocative work by bestselling author Ed Klein claims Hillary Clinton's health problems are much more severe than she has publicly revealed! 

 She had managed to keep her medical history secret out of fear that, should it become public, it would disqualify her from becoming president," writes Klein in BLOOD FEUD. 

BLOOD FEUD hits the street this week [it ranked #89 on AMAZON Sunday afternoon.] 

Page 193 

The true story of what happened to Hillary, which is being recounted in these pages for the first time, was radically different from Reines’s version. 

To begin with, Hillary fainted while she was working in her seventh-floor office at the State Department, not at home, as Reines told the media. She was treated at the State Department’s infirmary and then, at her own insistence, taken to Whitehaven to recover. However, as soon as Bill appeared on the scene and was able to assess Hillary’s condition for himself, he ordered that she be immediately flown to New York–Presbyterian Hospital in the Fort Washington section of Manhattan. When Reines subsequently released a statement confirming that Hillary was being treated at the hospital over the New Year’s holiday, it naturally intensified speculation about the seriousness of her medical condition. 

While she was at the hospital, doctors diagnosed Hillary with several problems. 

She had a right transverse venous thrombosis, or a blood clot between her brain and skull. She had developed the clot in one of the veins that drains blood from the brain to the heart. The doctors explained that blood stagnates when you spend a lot of time on airplanes, and Hillary had clocked countless hours flying around the world. 

To make matters worse, it turned out that Hillary had an intrinsic tendency to form clots and faint. In addition to the fainting spell she suffered in Buffalo a few years before, she had fainted boarding her plane in Yemen, fallen and fractured her elbow in 2009, and suffered other unspecified fainting episodes. Several years earlier, she had developed a clot in her leg and was put on anticoagulant therapy by her doctor. However, she had foolishly stopped taking her anticoagulant medicine, which might have explained the most recent thrombotic event. 

“The unique thing about clotting in the brain is that it could have transformed into a stroke,” said a cardiac specialist with knowledge of Hillary’s condition. 

Page 195 

According to a source close to Hillary, a thorough medical examination revealed that Hillary’s tendency to form clots was the least of her problems. She also suffered from a thyroid condition, which was common among women of her age, and her fainting spells indicated there was an underlying heart problem as well. A cardiac stress test indicated that her heart rhythm and heart valves were not normal. Put into layman’s language, her heart valves were not pumping in a steady way. 

When the author attempted to contact the Clintons’ cardiologist, Dr. Allan Schwartz, he refused to comment, which made it impossible to determine the exact nature of Hillary’s medical status or its long-term significance. However, sources who dis- cussed Hillary’s medical condition with her were told that Hillary’s doctors considered performing valve-replacement surgery. They ultimately decided against it. Still, before they released Hillary from the hospital, they warned Bill Clinton: “She has to be carefully monitored for the rest of her life.” 


 Click here to subscribe to  updates, success tips and offers
See other gifts available on Zazzle.

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Pat Boone Drops Bombshell in Impassioned Radio Call


  Pat Boone Had A Dream Though he claims not to be a 'birther', Pat Boone came onto the Alan Coombs radio show and more than stood his ground while backing up his anti-Obama sentiments with empiracle evidence. He cleverly couched his thoughts that came to him in a 'dream.' The surprisingly geneal Coombs -give this liberal commentator credit for having Boone on the air to announce his 'secret.' Did you happen to hear Pat Boone on the Alan Coombs show Monday? It was not only interesting as Coombs is a very left-leaning commentator and Boone is a Christian, very right-leaning entertainer not afraid of giving his views which go against the liberal-leaning entertainment industry. Leading the way was the 'birther issue', just one of many points to which Boone alluded. He said that he has knows of strong evidence that points to a phony birth certificate that Obama paraded out for the media and he that 'there will be proof' of such 'by November.' Boone admitted it would probably not mean much as , by law, one is allowed to be born in a foreign country as long as the mother was born ini the U.s. But, he said it's just another check on a long list of things that Obama has not shed light on. He noted that Obama hasn't even released any of his grades or school informantion , the only president not to do so, according to Boone, but which Coombs disputed. Whatever your political persuasion - as in Pat's great song, 'Friendly Persuasion ' hear it all for yourself - a sharp 80-year old Pat Boone expound: Now for a little fun, let's hear Pat with a rare, unlikely song he recorded in 1964 with the production of Beach Boy Bruce Johnson and Terry Melcher, ' Beach Girl' as we welcome summer

Friday, June 13, 2014

BENGHAZI NEWS, BLACKOUT - Hillary on BENGHAZI: 'What Difference Does It Make?' Modus Operandi , Latest Updates

SIGN THE petition


The State department was already apologizing on 9-11-12 for a 'violence causing video' even  before protests erupted in Egypt and Libya.  It is now becoming ever more  clear that this was part of a calculated political strategy to distance the administration from Al Queda one month before the presidential election . 

 NOW WHITE HOUSE COVER UP OF A COVERUP - New Benghazi Evidence Making Administration Squirm with More Excuses

5-1-14 White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, others go into 'coverup of the cover up' mode on the 9-11-12 Benghazi attack. House minority leader Nancy Pelosi said on TV today that 'nothing has changed' despite new, damning testimony that shows the White House KNEW of a terrorist attack rather than a false 'video' excuse for the 9-11-12 violence that killed four high ranking American officials in Benghazi. 

Yesterday, retired Air force General Robert Lovell told the House Committee on Benghazi that 'we should have tried,'believing that the State Department, under Hillary Clinton, never requested a rescue mission of the undermanned Benghazi US Embassy. 

It was also brought out by Buzzfeed yesterday, that the day before the 9-11-12 attack   that  Obama was already trying to deflect   impending international crisis by turning the tables and blaming Presidential candidate Romney  for his international agenda.  

benghazi bombshell - Independent group finally gets  answers showing direct connection to white house AND WORSE.

BENGHAZI BOMBSHELL - Independent group finally gets 'SMOKING GUN' direct connection to white house AND MORE

Not so surprising, an independent investigation was finally able to access emails which implicate the White House' s involvement in phony 'video' explanation for the Benghazi protest and attack. Top White House advistory, Ben Rhodes, literally sent out emails following the 9/11/12 attacks, which appear more like administration   face-saving PR instructions to underlings than honest backgound reports for  public consumption; this, only months before the Presidential election. 
The emails went out to all top level White House personal, including the President and Secretary of State well before Susan Rice and others began promoting the 'video' explanation. 

Furthermore, this independent 'Citizen's Committee' found that the U.S. was actually giving weapons to Al Queda! In its new Interim Report, the product of months of interviews with sources knowledgeable about what was happening in Libya, the CCB uncovers that, indeed, arms were going to al Qa’eda. “The U.S. facilitated the delivery of weapons and military support to al Qa’eda-linked rebels in Libya,” states one of the key findings of the report. The report also includes a summary of the 85 Freedom of Information Act requests submitted by Accuracy in Media (AIM) and the CCB.

All that spin from Obama apologists, gone in an instant.  All those questions about the original of the false “video protest” narrative pushed by the White House to save Barack Obama’s re-election campaign, answered at a stroke.  Yes, it was all a lie, and the White House knew it. They ordered it, for blatantly political purposes, and kept the proof secret until Judicial Watch finally managed to uncover some long-suppressed correspondence with a Freedom of Information Act request.  Remember when our gigantic, well-funded mainstream media organizations used to conduct that kind of investigation, instead of just obediently passing along the President’s talking points?

None of these documents are exactly “shocking,” because they buttress exactly what critics of the Administration have been saying all along.  It’s another great example of Obama’s strategy for political survival by “winning,” or at least enduring, one news cycle at a time.  Bombshell revelations lose their explosive force over time.  Emails that would have ended the 2012 presidential campaign are now a historical footnote.  The Obama-friendly mainstream press is unlikely to bring the story they’ve been trying to bury for the past two years back to the front pages, just to inform their readers that all of spin they previously delivered was invalid.  Critics of President Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were 100 percent right all along… but as the latter so memorably put it, “what difference, at this point, does it make?”

BENGHAZI BOMBSHELL - Independent group finally gets 'SMOKING GUN' direct connection to white house AND MORE

Judicial Watch announced today that on April 18, 2014, it obtained 41 new Benghazi-related State Department documents. They include a newly declassified email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.”  Other documents show that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack,” a possible kidnap attempt.

Precisely as we always expected.  The Administration had to deceive us about what happened in Benghazi, because to admit the truth would have burned Obama’s national security credibility away to ashes, right in the middle of his re-election campaign.  He didn’t want stories about how al-Qaeda was alive and kicking, how the State Department unbelievably dropped the ball on security in a terrorist hot zone… or for that matter, the simple fact that parts of Libya are terrorist hot zones.  The American people, and the families of the Benghazi dead, were lied to, for the most crass political reasons imaginable.

Upload Burt Kaufman  
from May , 2013 when White House refuted known talking point lies
0:22 / 1:30

White House Ignores ABC Report, Still Claims Only One Change Made To Talking Points

January 23, 2014 marked the one year anniversary of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Capitol Hill testimony about the terrorist attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. That day under oath, she said it didn’t matter how those four brave Americans lost their lives. We disagree and continue to demand answers. You should too:…CLICK  

  NutriSystem, Inc.

Hillary Clinton: Benghazi ‘biggest’ regret 

Whether she was just trying to soften the potential blow of Benghazi on her political career and  aspirations   for President - or perhaps she really meant it - former Secretary of State HILLARY CLINTON  came out today calling the Benghazi terrorist attack, under her watch, that left four American leaders dead her 'biggest regret' to date, at a conference in New Orleans of Automobile Dealers...

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remained vague on her 2016 ambitions Monday, but said her biggest regret while leading the department was the 2012 attacks in Benghazi.
“You make these choices...continued
Read more:


List Price:$59.99
Price:$12.95 FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
You Save:$47.04 (78%)
Ships from and sold by Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow?? Order within 23 hrs 24 mins and choose AmazonGlobal Priority Shipping at checkout. Details
  • Nine-inch tall, fully functional, resin nutcracker with amazing likeness of Hilary Clinton
  • Stainless steel teeth secured inside upper legs to grip and crack nuts in their shell
  • Stands upright and has internal stainless steel components and spring
  • Guaranteedto be the talk of any Party
  • Hand wash recommended

    20 new from $11.94


1-16-13    Bi-partisan Congressional Committee released findings January 16 that found major figures KNEW in advance that Benghazi was a terrorist action and 'preventable', according to chairperson Saxby Chambliss and others (Diane Feinstein was a key Democrat on the committee). 

While the CIA was prepared to send immediate help to rescue our four men in Benghazi,  the State Department wasn't and did nothing   to save the four American leaders in and near the Libyan embassy.  According to Chambliss State Department head at the time, Hillary Clinton and others have 'stonewalled' repeatedly ever since the September  11, 2012 incident  , not giving specific answers as to what happened. It is the belief that there was a 'strategy' meeting of the State Department around the time of Benghazi when the idea for the 'video' excuse for the raid was concocted. 

Also, at least four strong Al Quaida connections were noted from the report, refuting the State Departments statement that there was not connection between the Benghazi purpetrators and Al Quaida.  The above news was the first real bi-partisan expression that indicates wrong-doing by the State Department. However, it must be noted that the report failed to single out Clinton, herself, interstingly;  her name is only mentioned once, even though she was in charge. 

Now , that there is definite bi-partisan confirmation as to guilt on the part of the State Department, what will be next.  Will the issue be dropped or will State Department officials be singled out for possible convictions? 


                           SIGN THE PETITION                               END THE COVERUP
- See more at:




United States Ambassador to the United Nations since 2009, Susan Rice, the unlikely fill in for Dept of State HILLARY CLINTON on Sunday morning  news  shows following the Benghazi tragedy last September, continues the Administration  line that the Benghazi affair is not worthy of further investigation. 'I don't have time to talk about the false controversy,' She told Lesley Stahl, saying that there are much more important things to pursue and that the reason Clinton didn't show for those morning talk shows was  that she was much 'too busy'  and 'tired' after having to attend to the grieving families of the  Benghazi victims.  Gee, wouldn't you think that Clinton - and RICE ,now, over a year later-  would have wanted to once and for all clear up the Benghazi mess and 'questions that continue to be raised' per interviewer Lesley Stahl.  Hillary's line was that she 'doesn't like'to do Sunday morning TV interview.' In fact, Rice and Clinton know the truth and it's not pretty.

Pick One:

Like this if you think we should have Select Hearings on Benghazi ...


Update 12-1-13  
Did Hillary Clinton’s globetrotting ways as Secretary of State contribute to Benghazi disaster?

 Considering the June attack on the consulate, the August emergency meeting, and over 200 terror-related incidents in Libya since strongman Muammar Qaddafi was ousted, the U.S. embassy in Tripoli repeatedly requested additional security from State Dept. headquarters in Washington.

So what did then-Secretary Hillary Clinton and staff do? While staff turned down multiple media requests, she got out of town.  Literally. She packed her backs and traveled the world, visiting 112 countries, the most ever by any Secretary of State, and according to State Dept. records, logged nearly 1 million miles.  
When she returned to work in early January 2013 after a month-long series of illnesses, including a reported concussion, her staff proudly presented her with a football helmet and blue jersey with 112 emblazoned on the back.




     "What Difference...Does It Make?"

-  Poorly Secured Libyan Embassy even after many requests by Ambassador Stevens and others
-  Refusal to send in military jets during terrorist attack to at least try to stave off terrorist attackers
-  Denial of terrorist attack, after the fact, for a full two weeks: ' It was a protest over a Youtube video'
-  Refusal to give true details eight months later, only false promises that the purpetrators 'will be brought to        justice.'

That's what difference it makes, Hillary!

The modus operandi for the Obama Administration becomes obvious after we see it repeated so often:

1) Promise an investigation and that purpetrators 'will be brought to justice.'
2) Do nothing, really, for months
3) Refuse to talk pending the 'investigation.'
4) String along the investigation for many months until , hopefully, people will forget and other topics will
take over Americans' short attention spans.
5) When people ask , 'What REALLY Happened,' just tell them ' Oh, that was so long ago...'

Don't Miss BENGHAZI-GATE TIMELINE in Pictures (click)

Tshirts for Sale


October 27, 2013 4:09 PM
Benghazi was a planned, sophisticated attack by al Qaeda against a barely protected American outpost. Lara Logan reports.
(EDITORS NOTE: There was a following -perhaps forced -  retraction by 60 Minutes on the above story). Reporter Laura Logan has also since been fired by 60 minutes. We are awaiting further follow-up on these.

CBS and LAURA LOGAN / 60 MINUTES SUPRISE BENGHAZI STORY - One of the few times, if ever, 60 minutes has broken ranks with the liberal administraton and done, basically, a story going against the government. Truth that it may be, we haven't seen the likes of this story before from CBS, so kudos to Laura and powers that be.  We learn at the very end of the piece that 60 minutes has been doing a year long investigation of their own on Benghazi. We certainly got more out of this 20 minute story than we did from the State Department's investigation including mention of a new book by one of those Americans who was there during the Benghazi raids 'Embassy House'  by Morgan Jones (please search it from this link)



             September 11, 2012

                                              BENGHAZI TIMELINE 

but Hillary Clinton, the key link, is nowhere to be found...INSTEAD
     1)  Clinton goes to Australia to attend a Wine Tasting
       2) Clinton falls down in her home and has a concussion
3) Clinton has surgery for a blood clot in her head

A few days before she is to leave office as Secretary of State, 
Hillary Clinton finally shows for hearings and proclaims:

ANSWER (to Hillary) :

-  Poorly Secured Libyan Embassy even after many requests by Ambassador Stevens and others
-  Refusal to send in military jets during terrorist attack to at least try to stave off terrorist attackers
-  Denial of terrorist attack, after the fact, for a full two weeks: ' It was a protest over a Youtube video'
-  Refusal to give true details eight months later, only false promises that the purpetrators 'will be                brought to  justice.'
-  FOUR DEAD AMERICANS      - America Wants Answers How it happened and Who did it

ONE YEAR LATER  After Benghazi...
 Still No Answers from the Obama Administration

The modus operandi for the Obama Administration becomes obvious after we see it repeated so often:

1) Promise an investigation and that purpetrators 'will be brought to justice.'
2) Stonewall for months
3) Refuse to talk 'pending  the investigation.'
4) String along the 'investigation' for many months until , hopefully, people will forget Benghazi
and other topics willtake over Americans' short attention spans.
5) When people ask , 'What REALLY Happened,' just tell them ' Oh, that was so long ago...'

The State Department finally decides to have its own investigation but Hillary is never called to testify... 
And guess what's lurking around the corner...

BENGHAZI: 'What Difference Does It Make?' and Modus Operandi


Pick One:

Like this if you think we should have Select Hearings on Benghazi ...

Forget Obamacare - Affordable Health Insurance the Old Way

Quality Health Plans  for Less Than A Latte A day - Find Affordable Health Insurance Today! 

Compare prices from the web's best health insurance carriers.

Best Prices Anywhere!  Free Assistance by Phone!

How Does Obamacare Work?, Health Care Reform Timeline, Affordable Health Care Act,

patient and affordable care act,affordable patient care act,affordable care act information,
american affordable care act,health care affordable care act,affordable care act dental,
affordable care act mental health,patient protection and affordable health care act,

 Road To Success - BENGHAZI