The State department was already apologizing on 9-11-12 for a 'violence causing video' even before protests erupted in Egypt and Libya. It is now becoming ever more clear that this was part of a calculated political strategy to distance the administration from Al Queda one month before the presidential election .

NOW WHITE HOUSE COVER UP OF A COVERUP - New Benghazi Evidence Making Administration Squirm with More Excuses

5-1-14 White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, others go into 'coverup of the cover up' mode on the 9-11-12 Benghazi attack. House minority leader Nancy Pelosi said on TV today that 'nothing has changed' despite new, damning testimony that shows the White House KNEW of a terrorist attack rather than a false 'video' excuse for the 9-11-12 violence that killed four high ranking American officials in Benghazi.

Yesterday, retired Air force General Robert Lovell told the House Committee on Benghazi that 'we should have tried,'believing that the State Department, under Hillary Clinton, never requested a rescue mission of the undermanned Benghazi US Embassy.

It was also brought out by Buzzfeed yesterday, that the day before the 9-11-12 attack that Obama was already trying to deflect impending international crisis by turning the tables and blaming Presidential candidate Romney for his international agenda.

BENGHAZI BOMBSHELL - Independent group finally gets answers showing direct connection to white house AND WORSE.

Not so surprising, an independent investigation was finally able to access emails which implicate the White House' s involvement in phony 'video' explanation for the Benghazi protest and attack. Top White House advistory, Ben Rhodes, literally sent out emails following the 9/11/12 attacks, which appear more like administration face-saving PR instructions to underlings than honest backgound reports for public consumption; this, only months before the Presidential election.
The emails went out to all top level White House personal, including the President and Secretary of State well before Susan Rice and others began promoting the 'video' explanation.

Furthermore, this independent 'Citizen's Committee' found that the U.S. was actually giving weapons to Al Queda! In its new Interim Report, the product of months of interviews with sources knowledgeable about what was happening in Libya, the CCB uncovers that, indeed, arms were going to al Qa’eda. “The U.S. facilitated the delivery of weapons and military support to al Qa’eda-linked rebels in Libya,” states one of the key findings of the report. The report also includes a summary of the 85 Freedom of Information Act requests submitted by Accuracy in Media (AIM) and the CCB.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/citizens-commission-benghazi-releases-interim-report/#IFMq0CH9zkj3rIYq.99

By: John Hayward
4/29/2014 01:27 PM

All that spin from Obama apologists, gone in an instant. All those questions about the original of the false “video protest” narrative pushed by the White House to save Barack Obama’s re-election campaign, answered at a stroke. Yes, it was all a lie, and the White House knew it. They ordered it, for blatantly political purposes, and kept the proof secret until Judicial Watch finally managed to uncover some long-suppressed correspondence with a Freedom of Information Act request. Remember when our gigantic, well-funded mainstream media organizations used to conduct that kind of investigation, instead of just obediently passing along the President’s talking points?

None of these documents are exactly “shocking,” because they buttress exactly what critics of the Administration have been saying all along. It’s another great example of Obama’s strategy for political survival by “winning,” or at least enduring, one news cycle at a time. Bombshell revelations lose their explosive force over time. Emails that would have ended the 2012 presidential campaign are now a historical footnote. The Obama-friendly mainstream press is unlikely to bring the story they’ve been trying to bury for the past two years back to the front pages, just to inform their readers that all of spin they previously delivered was invalid. Critics of President Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were 100 percent right all along… but as the latter so memorably put it, “what difference, at this point, does it make?”

benghazi bombshell - Independent group finally gets answers showing direct connection to white house AND WORSE.

From the Judicial Watch press release:

Judicial Watch announced today that on April 18, 2014, it obtained 41 new Benghazi-related State Department documents. They include a newly declassified email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.” Other documents show that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack,” a possible kidnap attempt.

Precisely as we always expected. The Administration had to deceive us about what happened in Benghazi, because to admit the truth would have burned Obama’s national security credibility away to ashes, right in the middle of his re-election campaign. He didn’t want stories about how al-Qaeda was alive and kicking, how the State Department unbelievably dropped the ball on security in a terrorist hot zone… or for that matter, the simple fact that parts of Libya are terrorist hot zones. The American people, and the families of the Benghazi dead, were lied to, for the most crass political reasons imaginable.